Clinical and Radiologic Results of a Human Bone Graft Screw in Tarsometatarsal II/+III Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: For arthrodesis of the tarsometatarsal joints, there is the possibility of using a transplant screw made of allogenic human bone material (Shark Screw). This article investigates the clinical outcome and radiologic integration of the allogenic bone screw for arthrodesis of the tarsometatarsal joints II/+III. METHODS: This is a prospective study involving 20 feet of 17 patients who received TMT II/+III arthrodesis with an allogenic bone screw. A visual analog scale (VAS pain and function), Foot Function Index (FFI), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were used as measures to compare preoperative with postoperative results. Radiologic integration in the recipient bone was also evaluated. RESULTS: A significant mean pre- to postoperative improvement of all evaluated scores has been observed (P < .05) after a mean follow-up of 15.87 months (minimum 12 months, maximum 33 months). VAS score (pain) decreased from 7.6 to 1.4 points as well as a decrease of the VAS (function) from 7.25 to 1.8 points. Further, a reduction of the FFI from 62.3% to 16.7% and an increase from 29.7 to 79.9 points of the AOFAS was detected. Analyzing the FAOS score, in all surveyed subscales, there was an increase in the score (Symptoms: 55.2 to 85.6 points; Pain: 30.5 to 86.9 points; Function: 33.1 to 88.3 points; Quality of life: 27.8 to 79.7 points). Moreover, in all cases, a complete radiologic integration into the receiving bone was appreciated, and after a minimum follow-up time from 12 months, the screw in 19 feet (95%) was no longer distinguishable from the original bone. CONCLUSION: With these first results of the allogenic bone screw in TMT II/+III arthrodesis, a significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative was confirmed in the collected scores, and a full radiographic integration was demonstrated in all feet.

Reoperation of Maisonneuve fracture with quadricortical syndesmotic screw, zip tight and fibula elongation by autograph: a case report in covid-19 patient.

PURPOSE: . We report a Maisonneuve case of reoperation with proximal fibula fracture, diastasis of syndesmosis and parcel posterior detachment of the third malleolus. PRESENTATION OF CASES: We report a case of 49- year old patient with a Maisonneuve fracture. The first surgery has failed with three-cortical screw rupture.  The second surgery was based on the implantation of quadricortical screw, zip tight and fibula elongation with autograph. The results were excellent despite the patient having contracted Covid-19 virus during rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: Maisonneuve fracture is a misdiagnosed fracture. The diagnosis may be made by RX or TC of lower limb. There are many treatments provides to stabilized and reduced the ankle. We believe the gold standard is the correct realignment of syndesmosis and a strong synthesis. CONCLUSION: The Maisonneuve fracture accounts for 7% of all ankle fractures but misdiagnosed. We emphasize the importance of making good diagnosis of this fracture for an excellent surgical result and avoiding the chronic complications of incorrect treatment. In this case the physical rehabilitation is delayed by covid-19 infection so we suggest to carry out studies on post-operative period in orthopedic patients during this global pandemic.

Sliding hip screw vs intramedullary nail for AO/OTA31A1-A3: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: to conduct a systematic review with consequent meta-analysis evaluating the best treatment for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31A1-A3 trochanteric fractures when comparing the sliding hip screw (SHS) to the intramedullary nail (IMN). The outcomes used for comparison are major complications (in total, as well as nonunion and infection specifically), mortality rates, functional outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Search strings for the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Medline and Embase databases were developed with the help of a scientific librarian. Two authors screened the studies from the search string independently using Covidence.org and data extraction was performed similarly. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised trials (ROB2) for RCT studies, and Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-RCT studies. Meta-analyses were performed using Log Risk Ratio as the primary effect estimate. RESULTS: Of the 2,051 studies screened by the two authors, six RCTs and six non-RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 10,402 patients. The results indicated no significant differences in total major complications, nonunion, infection or mortality between SHS and IMN treatments for AO/OTA 31A1, 31A2 and 31A3 trochanteric fractures. Due to a lack of compatible data, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis on function scores and PROM. However, there are trends that favour IMN for 31A1 and 31A2 fractures. CONCLUSION: No significant difference between SHS and IMN was found in the meta-analysis in any of the examined AO/OTA fracture subtypes in terms of primary and secondary outcomes. When assessing function scores and PROM, we found trends favouring IMN for 31A1 and 31A2 fractures that should be explored further.

The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on the epidemiology of hip fractures in the elderly: a multicentre cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic presented extraordinary challenges to the UK healthcare system. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the epidemiology, treatment pathways and 30-day mortality rates of hip fractures. Outcomes of COVID-19 positive patients were compared against those who tested negative. METHODS: An observational, retrospective, multicentre study was conducted across six hospitals in the South East of England. Data were retrieved from the National Hip Fracture Database and electronic medical records. Data was collected for the strictest UK lockdown period (period B=23 March 2020-11 May 2020), and the corresponding period in 2019 (period A). RESULTS: A total of 386 patients were admitted during period A, whereas 381 were admitted during period B. Despite the suspension of the 'Best Practice Tariff' during period B, time to surgery, time to orthogeriatric assessment, and 30-day mortality were similar between period A and B. The length of inpatient stay was significantly shorter during period B (11.5 days vs 17.0 days, p<0.001). Comparison of COVID-19 positive and negative patients during period B demonstrated that a positive test was associated with a significantly higher rate of 30-day mortality (53.6% vs 6.7%), surgical delay >36h (46.4% vs 30.8%, p=0.049), and increased length of inpatient stay (15.8 vs 11.7 days, p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 lockdown did not alter the epidemiology of hip fractures. A substantially higher mortality rate was observed among patients with a COVID-19 positive test. These findings should be taken into consideration by the healthcare policymakers while formulating contingency plans for a potential 'second wave'.